Select Page

Is there a Company Backing PostgreSQL?

by | Jul 3, 2020 | NETWAYS

That’s a question I got asked when I was helping out at the PostgreSQL booth at this year’s FOSDEM.

I replied “yes”. And a second later, “there are even several!”.

But although the nerd density at FOSDEM is ridiculously high, I’m not sure he got that boolean joke “Are you going for lunch now or later?” “Yes.” … so, in the faint hope that, that guy will stumble upon this blogpost and hopefully as a nice read too many others, let me elaborate on that a bit.

PostgreSQL was Initially a Research Project

Back in the 1970’s, even in the US, universities could do research on things that would not directly lead to a patent for the corporate sponsor and a spinoff (owned predominantly by the corporate sponsor). They even received public money for such kind of research (whoo!), often from the DARPA.

Michael Stonebraker and Eugene Wong, who started PostgreSQL’s predecessor Ingres, were funded by a couple of military agencies, more detail here.

Stonebraker in fact did the spinoff “stunt” with Ingres which exists until today. However he returned to Berkeley to continue research on a “Post-Ingres” system, “Postgres”. Yada yada yada, long story short, Postgres was basically handed over to a group of enthusiast who kept working on it and turned it into PostgreSQL over time (we’re discussing the mid-90’s here). Some of those initial enthusiasts are still actively working on the project btw., one, Bruce Momjian, even attending FOSDEM on a regular basis!

It Today is a Community Project

The database system today is “owned”, which is in fact impossible due to the ridiculously open license, be the PostgreSQL Global Development Group, a non-profit that mainly runs the different sites. Alongside, there are several national & international non-profits, e.g. PgUS, PgEU and countless local usergroups, see the community page to get an idea.

… that allows a lot of Companies to generate Profit of it

So, people started doing serious stuff with Postgres, ran into problems and had them resolved, wanted advice on certain issues, get trained, or just someone to look after their databases on a regular base. Companies were founded, that specialised on PostgreSQL support and consulting. Some of these vanished, some still exist.

Some of these companies offer proprietary products that base on PostgreSQL. Also, there were “spinoffs”, companies that took the PostgreSQL code and ran with it, making something new of it. Just as well, some of these still exist and make good business.

… which some Feed Back partly into the Project

Many, if not most, of these companies contribute to PostgreSQL one way or the other. As a matter of fact, the vast majority of the core team members and major contributors work for a handful of companies.

Still, these people are probably working for those companies, because they are major contributers. E.g. Tom Lane these days works for Crunchy Data, but has been working for e.g. Red Hat and Salesforce before (rumours are that Salesforce hiring Tom was a huge factor in the Salesforce-Oracle “war” and led to their 2013 partnership – most probably due to a massive discount that Salesforce were willing to agree to…).

Corporate contributions are mostly code by hiring people, who hack on PostgreSQL and money by sponsoring infrastructure or events.

The community is rather small, so is the circle of corporate players. At the end of the days, everyone knows everyone and is engaged in a coopetition.

Most corporate code contributions stem from their customers’ requirements. Some improvements go to the proprietary variants first, very few go there only. However, the ultimate goal usually is to get a feature into the core product, so mainline, community PostgreSQL.

So how does this Model differ from Other Popular Projects?


These days, when we mention the kernel, we usually mean Linux, that has the Linux Foundation, essentially backed by all major players in IT, which realised that Linux is useful to them and decided to fund the development (essentially ending the UNIX wars).

There are only few, if at all, companies that “span off” the kernel, but the vast majority of code contribution these days is coming from corporations or their employees.

Some of these in turn “sell” Linux as distributions, essentially subscriptions today. Their share of Kernel contributions is a huge selling point.

Others, take NIC or SCSI controller manufacturers for example, were initially (like, 25 or 20 years ago) just hoping to sell a few more of their products by offering some nerd enthusiasts specs and technical documentation. Today, they know they just can’t sell anything that isn’t properly supported by Linux, and thus are willing to hire full-time developers to ensure so.

All of those contributions still go over the “benevolent dictator“‘s desk or one of his aides’ and thus have to fulfil certain requirements. And the distributors agreed years ago to only include mainline features in their products, to avoid fragmentation.

A major difference to PostgreSQL: all those companies (distributors aside) use Linux for their resp. products, not as their product.

MySQL / MariaDB

MySQL initially was written by the founders of MySQL AB, which was acquired by SUN in 2008, which in turn was acquired by Oracle in 2010.

While being an Open Source product and even being GPL-licensed as Free Software, MySQL was never renowned for being very open to contributions, however MySQL AB and SUN were striving to improve the product, based on what the “community” was wishing.

Oracle, being the major player in the RDBMS market, obviously has no interest in improving a “free” piece of software to a degree that it could effectively cannibalise their core product … so, the MySQL founders founded MariaDB and took a significant part of the MySQL developers with them.

Both products still evolve, but development is steered and driven by Oracle and MariaDB respectively (no idea what I should think of the MariaDB Foundation, to be totally honest), so probably to a good degree by the marketing departments and in Oracle’s case, fenced by the limitations from “above”.

Sure, you can get support from independent companies (many of those also offering PostgreSQL services, btw.). However, any large customer like financial institutions, the public sector, etc. prefer to go “straight to the source”, so chances are that offering support will stay a niche market. Percona maybe being the exception.

MongoDB et. al.

The “NoSQL” market is (IMHO) to a certain degree a reply to the pricing policy of RDBMS vendors and the “better safe than sorry” mentality of many IT managers. But that’s a different story …

However, a certain pattern has evolved over the last years:
Some Open Source projects become popular, companies are founded, the development is centralized there, conferences and trainings are offered etc.
And at some point, someone decides that actually earning money would be a nice idea …

So, an “enterprise” product is introduced, or a dual-license model, or a cloud service with limitation of competitors’ ability to offer such, etc. pp.

In essence, these are often Open Source products, but not Free Software. They sometimes get crippled beyond recognition.
The communities could sometimes be called that way because the mawning people in the forums are “managed” by “community members”.

Is this healthy? Couldn’t a Company buy PostgreSQL, like Oracle did with MySQL?

Short: No.
Longer: Sure, e.g. Oracle could probably buy one or most of those companies, but the product PostgreSQL is not “theirs”. I mean, even MySQL was forked after the acquisition of SUN …

We’ve seen PostgreSQL companies get bought, sometimes they even disappear from their “natural” markets.
But that had no significant impact on the project’s structure, pace or harmony.


  • is “smaller” than MySQL, Linux or many other important FOSS projects
  • we don’t have the power
  • nor Oracle’s cash and licensing department
  • is not controlled by any single entity, thus
  • “more free” than many other “open source” projects/products
  • can not be bought, shut down or in any way be tampered with
  • will never change its license
  • will never disappear
  • yet feeds a lot of mouths directly and many, many more indirectly, like your humble author here
  • many contribute back one way or the other

PostgreSQL is much closer to the Linux model, coopetition of many companies, plus a fair share of “private” contributors, than to any other Open Source DBMS, relational or not.

This worked very good for the last 25 years, and I doubt it will ever change.

As someone (was it Bernd Erk?) coined:
> “PostgreSQL doesn’t have a community, it is one!”

I second that!

Über den Author:

Gunnar “Nick” Bluth hat seine Liebe zu relationalen Datenbanken Ende des letzten Jahrtausends entdeckt. Über MS Access und MySQL 3.x landete er sehr schnell bei PostgreSQL und hat nie zurückgeschaut, zumindest nie ohne Schmerzen. Er verdient seine Brötchen seit beinahe 20 Jahren mit FOSS (Administration, Schulungen, Linux, PostgreSQL). Gelegentlich taucht er auch tiefer in die Programmierung ein, so als SQL-Programmierer bei der Commerzbank oder in App-Nebenprojekten.
Thomas Widhalm
Thomas Widhalm
Lead Support Engineer

Thomas war Systemadministrator an einer österreichischen Universität und da besonders für Linux und Unix zuständig. Seit 2013 möchte er aber lieber die große weite Welt sehen und hat sich deshalb dem NETWAYS Consulting Team angeschlossen. Er möchte ausserdem möglichst weit verbreiten, wie und wie einfach man persönliche Kommunikation sicher verschlüsseln kann, damit nicht dauernd über fehlenden Datenschutz gejammert, sondern endlich was dagegen unternommen wird. Mittlerweile wird er zum logstash - Guy bei NETWAYS und hält...
More posts on the topicNETWAYS

Let’s meet again – OSMC 2021

Good news! We’re happy to announce that the Open Source Monitoring Conference will take place this year again. Based on a survey with a resulting majority of two thirds of former OSMC attendees we are excited to organize our event again and can't wait to welcome you...

May the force be with you

Der erste Star Wars Film (Star Wars: Episode IV – Eine neue Hoffnung) kam bereits 1977 in den Kinos. Aber seit wann ist der 04.05. der sogenannte „Star Wars Tag“? Seit dem 04.05.1979 wird der 04. Mai jährlich als „Star Wars Tag“ gefeiert. Aber warum ist das so? Der...

Ansible – AWX|Tower State handling on Workflows

The Ansible Tower or its upstream AWX provides an easy to use GUI to handle Ansible tasks and schedules. Playbooks are configured as templates and as the name suggests, they can be modified to the needs, extended by variables, a survey or tags. Furthermore those...


Tue 18

Icinga 2 Fundamentals Training | Online

May 18 @ 09:00 - May 21 @ 17:00
Jun 15

stackconf online

June 15 - June 17
Jun 22

Ansible Fundamentals Training | Online

June 22 @ 09:00 - June 24 @ 17:00
Jun 22

Kubernetes Quick Start | Online

June 22 @ 09:00 - 17:00
Jun 25

Ansible AWX (Tower) Training | Online

June 25 @ 09:00 - 17:00